April 19, 2007
Managing Conflict
As one climbs the professional tree it is important to gain an understanding of when conflict is necessary. Like everything else too much positive or negative conflict can have repercussions.
The concept of positive conflict evolves around Social Darwinism. The strong survive, but the weak do not. In a work environment this concept can result in encouraging strong employees to prevail over the weaker ones. This concept leads to a behavior pattern where employees vigorously argue the point to have the idea adopted by rejecting all other ideas. Another resulting behavior pattern is the intense micromanaging of staff. The micromanagement results from a general belief that to get anything accomplished, people must be continually prodded by managers. Finally in this environment with too much positive conflict, teams never work. The fiercely competitive drive that is developed and nurtured obliterates all collaborative activities – unless it is a survivor scenario where two parties have an agreement against one party. Obviously in this environment, synergy and compromise are not recognized, and people begin to behave according to expectations. It can result in employees not feeling valued and a high turn over rate.
At the other extreme there is the negative perspective of conflict. With this perspective even the passionate discussion about a problem or other minor dispute is viewed as dysfunctional. Conflict is viewed as a waste of time, seemingly inefficient. Conflict is seen as stressful, one cannot add a point of view without having to justify it. Finally with these two behavior patterns, individuals just bunker down and become overly defensive. They just survive like an ostrich does in a defensive situation.
Obviously, too much positive conflict will result with some individuals having a negative view on conflict. Also too much of a negative perspective within an organization will result in a couple of pockets of positive conflict. Therefore a balance is needed to break the cycle. An organization needs conflict to function. However conflict needs to be managed. In one situation conflict may have a very positive affect, however in another it should just not be used. Differences should be expressed and then harness the good from the differences instead of just suppressing the differences. Encouraging and managing conflict in a productive manner stimulates innovations and improves moral for everyone. The result is a high performing team.
Conflict, at the right level, is a healthy and energizing force in an organization. But it must be managed carefully to ensure that it works creatively, and not destructively.
So true, so true.
Posted by: Edward at April 19, 2007 9:52 AMNo doubt that what you said is true. however, I was thinking about some readings I made about a french philosopher called Emmanuel Levinas that put forward two ideas.
the first one is the importance of self limitation rthat starts when you see the face of the other. As abstract as it seems seeing the face hints at considering the other one as an equal. This mere shift puts an equal as the recipient of your lmegitimate violence. As freedom, Levinas put that violence should be limited by the genuine respect you have for an equal. the failure of such a thing can be seen through the concept of vendetta
The second thing is that there must be a genuine trust in a positivist vision of justice. Looking back at what positivism is, positive justice is ajustice that proves to be trusted by everyone as a complete and unfaulty system.
The experience of violence and anger must be bounded:
by a trusted system
by a self limitation
to be a genuine experience.
indeed, excess leads to passion, that is a far cry from efficient violence
Posted by: raphael encaoua at April 20, 2007 7:36 AMFinally passed the test
Managing in light of McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y
CMMI
Kicking HIT Leadership Up a Notch
That's just some mumbo jumbo project management BS
Outcomes - The tactic to get to the strategy
Nurse Call, VOIP, and Wi-Fi: Its just cool when things come together!
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
August 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
Joel on Software
David Ross
Edward Prevost
Martin Fowler
The Health Care Blog
The Tales of Hoffman
The Business Word
Medical Rants
Christina's Considerations
Paul Levy
HIS Talk
Appropriate IT
Candid CIO
RSS feed




