June 24, 2005
Mach II: The Tipping Point
After reading Peter Farrell's Mach II is dead, I think it is time that Mach II was released to the community instead of being the individual work of Hal and Ben. They have done a great job, but better project management needs to occur or MachII will fade away. First a project team structure needs to be set up, there should be an oversite group which included individuals such as Hal, Ben and Sean. This group ultimately approves what needs to go in what release and what ways to communicate to the general public. My next suggestion is to add a group of developers to do the building. Developers who want to contribute for the good of the framework. Also a team of documentation experts would do well to be apart of the team. A shortfall of the project is the lack of documentation; if the framework was for the community then there should be more documentation. A way for the community to contribute documentation, like MachII.info needs to be recognized.
The next big items needed are a schedule and a change control process. Please correct me if I�m wrong, but there are no schedules for improvement or change control processes. At first the change of the Mach II framework was rampant, almost 4 version changes in six months. Then there was 1 change within 6 months, and now nothing since October 2004. An anticipated release and functionality schedule needs to be shared with the community at least one that will take advantages of what has been offered with CFMX 7 and fix the plugin manager bug.
Thinking of the plugin manager bug, the other item that needs to be shared with the community is the bug list or issues. The issue list needs to capture what will be fixed, what won�t be fixed, and what doesn�t need to be fixed. This will give everyone a good sense of where the Mach-II project is at the current time. JIRA is available to most open-source projects for free. How many issues or bugs are there with the current Mach-II?
The final item is that throughout the project, there seems to be little or no planning to anything outside of the first code development, and this item is causing Mach-II to fail. There is no substitute to planning, and a project without planning will always fail. Good luck to Model-Glue to avoid this risk, just plan a little more communication, a schedule of releases, and a project team with community involvement.
Fusebox tried this...it didn't work!
Posted by: johnb at June 24, 2005 2:01 PMHi,
Most of it fusebox did try, but I think it did work.
E
Posted by: Elyse at June 25, 2005 10:43 AMThanks for the blog entry Elyse. We appear to be on the loosing front. In the end, I don't care if I'm wrong. All I wanted was people to talk about the future of Mach-II since the inventors rarely say much about it nowadays.
Best,
.Peter
ICD-10 is in the distance
Deming's Adaption of the 14 Points for Medical Service
Do we have the right mix of projects?
Priorization: The art of choosing what not to do
The key elements in establishing a PMO
The Code Yellow Required meeting
Typical Barriers rolling out a project status reporting process.
July 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
August 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
Joel on Software
David Ross
Edward Prevost
Martin Fowler
The Health Care Blog
The Tales of Hoffman
The Business Word
Medical Rants
Christina's Considerations
Paul Levy
HIS Talk
Appropriate IT
Candid CIO
RSS feed




