March 14, 2005
Exception Workflow Applications Needed
Interfacing data from one system to another always needs to include some type of exception and comparison reporting. This reporting however really needs to be closely examined. What value is there in generating a paper report that states out of 245 inpatient cases, 237 were successfully interfaced? These 8 accounts need to be identified as to why they are on the exception list. Here is where in some places the drill down stops, and what I’m proposing should change.
In reality exception reports are just a worklist for someone to go digging in the various systems to find which information is missing. But what if instead of having an individual go digging, we actually created a systematic system to do the digging? What I am referring to is this, imagine a situation with ed charge capture. Have a tool that always multiple people to work the exception list, probably web based. But let the tool be all financial exceptions to the final completion of this account. First there is the screen listing the exception accounts, then you can categorize the exceptions to the missing inforamtion, and drilling down on the exception account yields the missing information to fully completing the account.
For example with treat and release patients, there will need to be information from patient access or registration, coding and abstracting, and charges for supplies, level of service, procedures, labs, and drugs. So the exception tool may report off of all items preventing this case from properly billing. For example let’s say in the billing system the insurance information didn’t interface properly, but it exists in the registration system. This would place the account on the exception report, categorize it as an interface issue, and maybe even try resending the info once automatically. Or for example let’s say the coding wasn’t completed, and this was one of the items in the drill down. When querying the in coding db, it is noticed that the chart has not been received yet. New category for the error, and everyone can track.
With this manner of managing by expections for the total account, it would be easier to identify trends and issues, which hopefully would improve workflow.
Key word there is "hopefully".
Call me cynical, but I've found you can create all the reports in the world detailing every possible process improvement, but until you drill down to the level of "This error kept $x.xx from getting into Dr. Smiths pocket by x# of days" getting people to change the way they work is next to impossible.
Posted by: Peter at March 14, 2005 4:00 PMYou should look at the workdrivers that Stockamp & Associates has developed (shameless plug... I work there).
http://www.stockamp.com
Posted by: Dan at March 23, 2005 5:28 PMFinally passed the test
Managing in light of McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y
CMMI
Kicking HIT Leadership Up a Notch
That's just some mumbo jumbo project management BS
Outcomes - The tactic to get to the strategy
Nurse Call, VOIP, and Wi-Fi: Its just cool when things come together!
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
August 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
Joel on Software
David Ross
Edward Prevost
Martin Fowler
The Health Care Blog
The Tales of Hoffman
The Business Word
Medical Rants
Christina's Considerations
Paul Levy
HIS Talk
Appropriate IT
Candid CIO
RSS feed




