November 23, 2003
System Monitoring
One of the most overlooked aspects of implementing a system, is monitoring its functionality when it is live.
The reasoning for monitoring is that within healthcare systems, one system depends on many to function properly. To get data to all of the systems that require the data, the data needs to go through many different routes. For example to get your laboratory results in the clinical data repository, your information gets entered into the registration system, then proceeds to the interface engine, which forwards it on to the laboratory system. The laboratory system then send an order status update to the interface engine, which sends the update to the registration system. The registration system then send the confirmation of your information to the interface engine and on to the laboratory system, which sends the actual result to the interface engine and finally to the clinical data repository. There are a lot of steps in this process that are interdependent. I didn't even go into the network connectivity and server functionality. Having the ability to monitor a interconnected system's functionality at the data integrity level (meaning we sent this did you get this where you expected) and at the level of date entry functionality helps to create a reliable functioning system. It also helps to alert the proper individuals quickly when an issue has occurred.
Users need to have faith in the system, and they don't want or need to understand all of the interdependent steps. They want to be assured that what they enter gets to where they expect. Having the same information entered on several test patients in a production system helps this process. After all 1% of an applications downtime can cost a 500-bed hospital 1.4 million a year. (statistic from Healthcare Informatics, April 2002, "The Toll of Downtime") That is 87.6 cumulative hours for the year for application's available 24 hours a day 7 days a week.
Another aspect of this when implementing systems, is to be considerate of all of the interdependent parts, and try to minimize unnecessary functionality until needed.
For example, if you are implementing a routing system for distributed printing for the transcription system. Wait until you print to more than just one printer in the transcriptionist's department.
Where can I follow up for more information
Posted by: Aly at August 8, 2004 3:25 PMFinally passed the test
Managing in light of McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y
CMMI
Kicking HIT Leadership Up a Notch
That's just some mumbo jumbo project management BS
Outcomes - The tactic to get to the strategy
Nurse Call, VOIP, and Wi-Fi: Its just cool when things come together!
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
August 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
Joel on Software
David Ross
Edward Prevost
Martin Fowler
The Health Care Blog
The Tales of Hoffman
The Business Word
Medical Rants
Christina's Considerations
Paul Levy
HIS Talk
Appropriate IT
Candid CIO
RSS feed




